United Teachers of Los Angeles, representing more than 33,000 teachers, is poised to strike Monday, Jan. 14, the Los Angeles Unified School District, which UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl recently characterized, as “a strike for our students….for our schools, for educational justice, for racial justice, and to defend the future of public education.”
The district’s website, on Friday, Jan 11, said, “We are extremely disappointed…UTLA has rejected Los Angeles Unified’s revised offer without proposing any counter offer. UTLA has refused to continue contract negotiations. More than 48 hours remain until Monday when UTLA plans to strike, and we implore UTLA to reconsider. A strike will harm the students, families and communities we serve, and we have a responsibility to resolve the situation without a strike.”
Meanwhile, an email in part from the union, also on Friday, said, “Today, just as LAUSD representatives were passing out a new proposal, UTLA bargaining team members began to see on social media that (Superintendent Austin) Beutner was holding a press conference downstairs to review the same proposal. More disrespect – Beutner saying he’s able to bargain “around the clock” but skipping the last two sessions. More bargaining in the media rather than meeting face-to-face with educators (sic). More lies about what the district has and what the district can do.”
An email from the union sent Thursday, Jan. 10, said that a Superior Court ruled the union could strike. An email the previous day from the union said it was postponing the strike to avoid confusion.
Scott Mandel, who is the chair of UTLA (San Fernando) Valley East Area, on Monday, Jan. 7, said, “I went through the ’89 strike 29 years ago, we are so much better prepared now than we were then. Our teachers are more unified now than we were then.”
Mandel, who is also the chair of the union’s National Board Certified Teachers Committee and has a Ph.D. in Education: Curriculum and Development from the University of Southern California, added if there were a strike, it wouldn’t be about money. He said the union was asking for 6.5 percent and the Los Angeles Unified School District had already agreed to 6 percent. He said it would be “ridiculous” to strike over the difference. A strike would be about support for the students. The union’s demands are for a “class size reduction,” for “a nurse in every school, every day,” for “a full-time librarian in every secondary school,” for more counselors, for the elimination of all testing that isn’t federal or state mandated and for “the regulation of charter growth.”
The UTLA Valley East Chair, who’s been teaching for 34 years at LAUSD, ended passionately. He said, “Beutner wants this strike, especially after (the) Janus (Decision). Beutner thinks he can destroy the teachers’ union and turn this into a portfolio district, where schools are given over to privateers and charters…The heart and soul of public schools in LA Unified is on the line right now…This is our Armageddon.”
Kyle Stokes of KPCC, on Wednesday, Jan 2, interviewed Beutner, who became Superintendent in May 2018 and according to the district’s website, a business executive, served as First Deputy Mayor of the City of Los Angeles and publisher of the Los Angeles Times.
The Superintendent said, “We all want the same set of things. We all want to make sure everyone, who works in the schools, is better paid. We all want to work to reduce class size and hire more nurses, counselors and librarians. The challenge is how we do it with the resources we have.”
On the existing contract provision giving the district discretion on class size, the Superintendent said, “We have said for months and the fact-finder agreed with us is we should eliminate that provision and we need to agree on a new provision….UTLA said eliminate that provision and they will not sit down with us to try to agree on a new provision.”
Beutner, regarding the almost $2 billion reserve, said that almost $200 million had already been spent for raises to bus drivers, cafeteria workers, clerical staff and engineers who keep the air conditioners; that about $300 has been set aside for the 6 percent increase for UTLA members; that about $300 million because of law for certain students, as part of a local control funding program; about $250 million has been sent to schools to be spent at school principals’ discretion; and about $100 million for legal settlement, which he said left $700 million. He insisted the reserves are being spent. He said, “From an accounting standpoint, you wind up with some funny accounting because the reserves to pay UTLA members continue to grow.”
He added near the end of the interview the experts have told him the district is spending more than it’s bringing in.
I CAN’ BELIEVE , WITH AL THE MONEY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS IN RESERVE, THEY CAN BE SO GREEDY AND SELFISH .
LikeLike
Hi Barry. Loyal reader, first time requester here. Can we get an update and an op-ed slanted satirically in favor of Beutner?
LikeLike